AFGS�87219B APPENDIX A
VERIFICATION METHODS
It is necessary to verify that all required EPS diagnostic and testability capabilities function as intended. Each of the following activities can be utilized to assist with the verification of these capabilities.
1. In-process verification should be accomplished by conducting a comprehensive comparative analysis of status monitoring, diagnostic, maintenance, and servicing functions required for the EPS, its subsystems, equipment, components, and parts versus the embedded capabilities and support resources identified. The results of the analysis and any modeling (for example, the Logistics Composite Model (LCOM) should, at a minimum, be presented and critically reviewed at system PDR and CDR. Data for comparison should be drawn from the results and records of the following:
a. Logistic Support Analysis (LSA)- MIL-HDBK-502, tasks 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 301, 302,
303, 401, and 402 to the extent that these tasks have been iterated.
b. Maintainability- MIL-HDBK-470, task 201, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
(SAE AIR4845).
c. Avionics Integrity Program (AVIP)-MIL-STD-1796, Durability/Economic Life Plan.
d. Mechanical Equipment and Subsystems Integrity Program (MECSIP)-MIL-STD-1798, Task V, Integrity Management Data Package.
e. Older systems may reference the canceled, Software Development Integrity Program (SDIP)-MIL-STD-1803, Software Integrity Maintenance Approach. Use IEEE 12207 - Sysetems and Software Engineering - Software Life Cycle Process. A Computer Systems and Software Integrity Program (CSSIP) is in development. Refer to CSSIP guidance upon publication.
f. Systems and Software Engineering - Software Life Cycle Process - IEEE 12207. Older systems may reference the canceled, Defense System Software Development-
DOD-STD-2167A, Computer Resource Integrated Support Document (CRISD), software operational/support plans.
g. Aeronautical Systems Survivability (For Combat Mission Effectiveness)-
MIL-HDBK-1799, task 104, Survivability Maintenance/Surveillance Plan and the maintenance/surveillance programs developed thereunder.
2. Functional verification/qualification of the diagnostic and testability requirements should be accomplished incrementally during EPS development, test and evaluation (DT&E), and operational test and evaluation (OT&E) by using a combination of tests and demonstrations which include those listed below.
64
For Parts Inquires call Parts Hangar, Inc (727) 493-0744
© Copyright 2015 Integrated Publishing, Inc.
A Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business